Bibliography Category: Interagency Relationships, Networks, and Contracts

Peeler, Michael J. Command and Control: Toward Arctic Unity of Command and Unity of Effort. Monograph, School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 2011. http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll3/id/2724 (accessed 12 August 2011). This study examines issues facing the U.S. military command and control structure in the Arctic. This monograph proposes three command and control options to be […]

Patrick, Stewart and Kaysie Brown. Greater than the Sum of its Parts?: Assessing ‘Whole of Government’ Approaches to Fragile States. New York: International Peace Academy, 2007. http://www.cgdev.org/doc/books/weakstates/GREATER_THAN_THE_SUM%20E-Book2.pdf (accessed 21 July 2011). This book provides a comparative assessment of recent efforts by individual donor governments to integrate their defense, diplomatic, development, and other policies in engaging […]

Patrick, Stewart. Weak Links: Fragile States, Global Threats, and International Security. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. This book examines global threats to international security. The author analyzes terrorism, transnational crime, WMDs, pandemic diseases, and energy insecurity.

Patrick, Stewart. The U.S. Response to Precarious States: Tentative Progress and Remaining Obstacles to Coherence. Essay, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, 2007. http://www.cgdev.org/files/14093_file_Precarious_States.pdf (accessed 20 March 2012). This essay examines the U.S. response to failed and failing states. Improved U.S. performance in prevention, crisis response, and the long-term process of statebuilding after conflict will […]

Parrott, Leon F. Military Engineers: An Interagency Bridge Between Hard and Soft Power. Strategy Research Project, United States Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA, 2010. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA518351&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (accessed 6 October 2011). In this paper the author asserts that in an age of persistent conflict a comprehensive approach that combines all the elements of national power, soft […]

Other Agencies on Mission’s “Country Team.” U.S. Diplomacy: An Online Exploration of Diplomatic History and Foreign Affairs. U.S. Diplomacy, (n.d.). http://www.usdiplomacy.org/state/abroad/countryteam.php (accessed 31 October 2011). This article examines the U.S. departments and agencies that make up “country teams” in U.S. embassies.

Olson, Steven J. and David A. Anderson. 2011. Building Interagency Capabilities at U.S. Africa Command. InterAgency Journal Vol. 2, no. 2 (Summer): 16-23. http://thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/IAJ-2-2-pg16-23.pdf (accessed 25 August 2011). This article examines interagency capabilities at U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM). The article includes information about AFRICOM’s civilian staff, interagency and international partners, and AFRICOM’s role in foreign policy.

O’Leary, Rosemary and Lisa Blomgren Bingham. The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009. This book brings together original contributions by public management and public policy scholars who address cutting-edge issues that affect government managers worldwide. Topics include organizational design and performance, resource sharing, and contracting.

O’Leary, Rosemary, Catherine Gerard, and Lisa Blomgren Bingham. 2006. Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management. Public Administration Review Vol. 66, no. s1: 6-9. http://glennschool.osu.edu/faculty/brown/home/Public%20Management/PM%20Readings/OLeary_Rosemary.pdf (accessed 17 October 2012). This article examines collaborative public management and includes examples of successful endeavors in the United States and the Philippines.

Nofi, Albert A. Defining and Measuring Shared Situational Awareness. Center for Naval Analysis. Alexandria, VA, 2000. http://www.cna.org/research/2000/defining-measuring-shared-situational-awareness (accessed 5 October 2012). This report attempts to define “shared situational awareness,” exploring previous definitions and comparing individual and shared situational awareness. The report also explores options for measuring situational awareness.