INTERAGENCY BIBLIOGRAPHY

“I submit that the risk of not sharing [information] today is a lot greater than the risk of sharing.”

– GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, USAF, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, 2005

Interagency Bibliography The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is part of the Center’s mission to foster and develop an interagency body of knowledge and to promote the research, study, and analysis of interagency issues. The bibliography contains over 1,200 entries regarding interagency issues, and includes reports from the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service, professional publications by subject matter experts, and academic research from both military and non-military institutions. The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is organized by topic. Bibliography entries that involve more than one topic are grouped by the most relevant or prevailing topic. Users may follow the links below to navigate the bibliography, or they may use the website’s search engine located at the upper right of the page.

The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography was last updated 09/30/2016.

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Pearce, Edward L. 2011. Joint Chiefs of Staff J&, Joint Education and Doctrine Division. Joint Forces Quarterly no. 61 (April): 113-114. http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/images/jfq-60/JFQ60_113-114_Pearce.pdf (accessed 13 December 2011). This article provides an overview of the function and purpose of the Joint Chiefs of Staff J7, Joint Education and Doctrine Division.

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Pazos, Rafael F. “Pete.” Stability and Reconstruction Operations Planning: Embrace Before Pursuing the Interagency. Monograph, School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 2006. http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll3/id/748 (accessed 12 August 2011). This monograph examines stability and reconstruction operations in Iraq and the apparent lack of interagency cooperation. The author argues that the lack of cooperation was only […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Paul, Christopher. Whither Strategic Communication? A Survey of Current Proposals and Recommendations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP250.html (accessed 19 July 2011). This survey includes a detailed discussion of several frequently appearing recommendations, including revised legislation, leveraging the private sector, the adoption of enterprise-level or whole-of-government solutions, better use of research, a greater focus […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Patterson, Rebecca. Revisiting a School of Military Government: How Reanimating a World War II-Era Institution Could Professionalize Military Nation Building. Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, 2011. http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/EE%20Revisiting%20report-final_withphotos.pdf (accessed 26 July 2011). This paper details the U.S. Army−established School of Military Government and its related Civil Affairs Training Program that prepared forces for occupational […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Patrick, Stewart and Kaysie Brown. Greater than the Sum of its Parts?: Assessing ‘Whole of Government’ Approaches to Fragile States. New York: International Peace Academy, 2007. http://www.cgdev.org/doc/books/weakstates/GREATER_THAN_THE_SUM%20E-Book2.pdf (accessed 21 July 2011). This book provides a comparative assessment of recent efforts by individual donor governments to integrate their defense, diplomatic, development, and other policies in engaging […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Patrick, Stewart. Weak Links: Fragile States, Global Threats, and International Security. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. This book examines global threats to international security. The author analyzes terrorism, transnational crime, WMDs, pandemic diseases, and energy insecurity.

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Patrick, Stewart. The U.S. Response to Precarious States: Tentative Progress and Remaining Obstacles to Coherence. Essay, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, 2007. http://www.cgdev.org/files/14093_file_Precarious_States.pdf (accessed 20 March 2012). This essay examines the U.S. response to failed and failing states. Improved U.S. performance in prevention, crisis response, and the long-term process of statebuilding after conflict will […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Parsons, Michael D. Foul WX Underground: The Dynamics of Resistance and the Analog Logic of Communication during Digital Blackout. Monograph, School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 2009. http://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll3/id/2467 (accessed 15 August 2011). This research proposes a framework in defense support to civil authorities for the mutual consideration of battle command, knowledge management, information […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Parsons, Michael D. Beyond Triage: The Escalation of Empowerment by U.S. Military Forces in Support of International Disaster Response. Master’s Thesis, Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 2008. http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll2/id/1628 (accessed 12 August 2011). This study provides a broad operational-level survey of the conditions for the U.S. military response to the Indonesian Tsunami in […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Parrott, Leon F. Military Engineers: An Interagency Bridge Between Hard and Soft Power. Strategy Research Project, United States Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA, 2010. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA518351&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (accessed 6 October 2011). In this paper the author asserts that in an age of persistent conflict a comprehensive approach that combines all the elements of national power, soft […]

... Read More

1 38 39 40 41 42 123
  • "*" indicates required fields

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

    Sign up to receive updates by email. We do not sell or share your info.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.