INTERAGENCY BIBLIOGRAPHY

“I submit that the risk of not sharing [information] today is a lot greater than the risk of sharing.”

– GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, USAF, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, 2005

Interagency Bibliography The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is part of the Center’s mission to foster and develop an interagency body of knowledge and to promote the research, study, and analysis of interagency issues. The bibliography contains over 1,200 entries regarding interagency issues, and includes reports from the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service, professional publications by subject matter experts, and academic research from both military and non-military institutions. The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is organized by topic. Bibliography entries that involve more than one topic are grouped by the most relevant or prevailing topic. Users may follow the links below to navigate the bibliography, or they may use the website’s search engine located at the upper right of the page.

The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography was last updated 09/30/2016.

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marks, Edward and Margaret Costa. Department of International Relations. Washington, DC: Project on National Security Reform, (n.d.). http://old.pnsr.org/data/files/additional%20research/department%20of%20international%20relations.pdf (accessed 18 October 2011). This paper discusses proposed reforms of U.S. “soft power” agencies, combining the agencies into one expansive Department of International Relations. The new department would consolidate the majority of foreign affairs programs in order […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marks, Edward and Lisa Adavahis. Structures in Current Environment: Proposed Solutions. Washington, DC: Project on National Security Reform, (n.d.). http://old.pnsr.org/data/files/additional%20research/structures%20in%20current%20environment-%20proposed%20solutions.pdf (accessed 18 October 2011). This paper discusses multilateralism in United States Government, how it is perceived by other nations, its problems, and proposed solutions.

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marks, Edward and Christopher Lamb. 2012. Implementing the QDDR. InterAgency Journal Vol. 3, no. 1 (February): 8-14. http://thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/IAJ-3-1-pg8-14.pdf (accessed 22 February 2012). This article examines the State Department’s 2010 Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), which was meant to provide a comprehensive plan to “improve the efficiency and effectiveness of State and USAID in delivering results for […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marks, Edward. PACOM, JIACG, and the War of Terror. Washington, DC. National Defense University, 2005. http://www.ndu.edu/itea/storage/678/PACOM%20JIACG%20and%20the%20War%20on%20Terror.pdf (accessed 14 May 2012). This paper examines United States Pacific Command’s Joint Interagency Coordination Group for Counterterrorism (JIACG/CT).

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marks, Edward. 2010. Rethinking the Geographic Combatant Commands. InterAgency Journal Vol. 1, no. 1 (Fall): 19-23. http://thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/IAJ-1-1-pg19-23.pdf (accessed 21 July 2011). This article gives a history of Geographic Combatant Commands (GCCs) and proposes changes to the current structure. The proposed changes are not expected to affect the functionality of the GCCs.

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Markel, M. Wade, Henry A. Leonard, Charlotte Lynch, Christina Panis, Peter Schirmer, Carra S. Sims. Developing U.S. Army Officers’ Capabilities for Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational Environments. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2011. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG990.html (accessed 19 July 2011). This monograph identifies and describes the knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable Army officers to succeed in […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marisam, Jason. 2012. The Interagency Marketplace. Minnesota Law Review Vol. 96, no. 3 (March): 881-944. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2027469 (accessed 26 March 2012). This article offers a comprehensive descriptive and normative account of the legal rules governing the interagency marketplace. The author claims that the interagency marketplace has the potential to generate significant governmental efficiencies by allowing agencies […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marcella, Gabriel. National Security and the Interagency Process. The U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Issues Vol. 2, 4th edition: 47-69. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?PubID=1005 (accessed 28 July 2011). This article explores the U.S. national security structure as it relates to the “interagency process.” The article is part of The U.S. Army War College Guide to […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Marcella, Gabriel. Affairs of State: The Interagency and National Security. Monograph, Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2008. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=896 (accessed 28 July 2011). This collection sheds light on how the interagency works with respect to national security. Each chapter addresses matters of institutional culture and the […]

... Read More

Posted: May 23, 2012 by the

Manuel, Kate M. and Brian T. Yeh. Interagency Contracting: An Overview of Federal Procurement and Appropriations Law. CRS Report for Congress R40814. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2010. http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40814_20110111.pdf (accessed 29 July 2011). This report examines interagency contracting, procurement relationships, contracting authorities, and other topics related to interagency contracting.

... Read More

1 51 52 53 54 55 123
  • "*" indicates required fields

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

    Sign up to receive updates by email. We do not sell or share your info.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.