INTERAGENCY BIBLIOGRAPHY

“I submit that the risk of not sharing [information] today is a lot greater than the risk of sharing.”

– GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, USAF, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, 2005

Interagency Bibliography The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is part of the Center’s mission to foster and develop an interagency body of knowledge and to promote the research, study, and analysis of interagency issues. The bibliography contains over 1,200 entries regarding interagency issues, and includes reports from the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service, professional publications by subject matter experts, and academic research from both military and non-military institutions. The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is organized by topic. Bibliography entries that involve more than one topic are grouped by the most relevant or prevailing topic. Users may follow the links below to navigate the bibliography, or they may use the website’s search engine located at the upper right of the page.

The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography was last updated 09/30/2016.

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Gorkowski, Justin. A Penny for Your Thoughts, a Nickel for Your Heart: Buying Popular Support for Counterinsurgency. in Karen Gutteri’s Complex Operations Case Studies Series Vol. 6. Washington, DC: Center for Complex Operations, National Defense University, 2010. http://www.nps.edu/Academics/AcademicGroups/GPPAG/Docs/PDF/Research%20and%20Publications/6_TN_Penny_for_Thoughts.pdf (accessed 19 December 2011). This case study discusses a particular strategy of combating insurgencies, used in Iraq […]

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Goodman, Will. Making Consequence Management Work: Applying the Lesson of the Joint Terrorism Task Force. Monterery, CA: Naval Postgraduate School Center for Homeland Defense and Security, 2008. http://www.hsaj.org/?special:fullarticle=9999.1.4 (accessed 12 February 2012). This essay describes the experience of the Joint Terrorism Task Force, a form of interagency counterterrorism unit set up in many areas across […]

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Goodby, James E., Daniel L. Burghart, Cheryl A. Loeb, and Charles L. Thornton. Cooperative Threat Reduction for a New Era. Washington, DC: National Defense University Center for Technology and National Security Policy, 2004. http://www.ndu.edu/CTNSP/docUploaded/DTP4%20CTR%20for%20a%20New%20Era.pdf (accessed 8 August 2011). This paper is concerned with nuclear threat reduction, especially the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program. It reviews […]

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Good, Anthony Scott. U.S. Border Patrol OCONUS: Possible Contributions to the ‘Whole-of-Government’ Approach to Stability Operations. Master’s Thesis, Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 2010. http://cdm16040.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll2/id/2686/rec/11 (accessed 15 June 2011). This paper looks at and identifies the possible assistance that the U.S. Border Patrol could contribute to the whole of government approach to […]

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Gonzales, Daniel, Chad J.R. Ohlandt, Eric Landree, Carolyn Wong, Rima Bitar, John Hollywood. The Universal Core Information Exchange Framework: Assessing Its Implications for Acquisition Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2011. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2011/RAND_TR885.pdf (accessed 15 August 2011). This report presents observations from an ongoing research project that is tasked with assessing and improving Department of Defense […]

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Gong, Carlene. U.S. Interagency Response to the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Washington, DC: Project on National Security Reform, (n.d.). http://old.pnsr.org/web/page/929/sectionid/579/pagelevel/3/parentid/590/interior.asp (accessed 16 August 2012). This document examines the United States response to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. The success of the U.S. response largely resulted from the thorough integration and flexibility of the involved government organizations, which […]

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Gompert, David C., Terrence K. Kelly, Brooke Stearns Lawson, Michelle Parker and Kimberly Colloton. Reconstruction Under Fire: Unifying Civil and Military Counterinsurgency. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG870 (accessed 20 July 2011). The authors propose the several measures to improve the security of civil COIN.

... Read More

Posted: May 22, 2012 by the

Goldsmith, Stephen and William D. Eggers. Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2004. This book examines how managers on both sides of the aisle, public and private, are coping with recent changes in public service and policy. Drawing from dozens of case studies, as well as established […]

... Read More

Posted: May 21, 2012 by the

Gniady, Lisa Noel. “Bridging the Gap: Department of Defense’s Planning for Domestic Disaster Assistance.” Master’s Thesis, Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 2008.  http://cdm16040.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll2/id/2572/rec/5 (accessed 16 June 2011). This research attempts to identify if the changes within DoD are sufficient to form the basis for an improved response to future domestic disasters. It […]

... Read More

Posted: May 21, 2012 by the

Glain, Stephen. State vs. Defense: The Battle to Define America’s Empire. New York: Random House, Inc., 2011. This book reviews and analyzes the State/Defense relationship, examining the great figures who crafted American foreign policy, from George Marshall to Robert McNamara to Henry Kissinger to Don Rumsfeld.  In the author’s view, America has become increasingly imperial and […]

... Read More

1 69 70 71 72 73 123
  • "*" indicates required fields

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

    Sign up to receive updates by email. We do not sell or share your info.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.