Bibliography Category: Interagency History, Structures, and Authorities

Cho, Chung-Lae and Deil S. Wright. 2001. Managing Carrots and Sticks: Changes in State Administrators’ Perceptions of Cooperative and Coercive Federalism During the 1990s. Publius: The Journal of Federalism Vol. 31, no. 1: 57-80. http://publius.oxfordjournals.org/content/31/2/57.full.pdf+html?sid=ecbce89a-7157-4ad4-a170-31846d9fce3b (accessed 27 October 2011). This paper investigates changes in intergovernmental relations between the national and state governments in the 1990s […]

Central Intelligence Agency. “About CIA.” Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/index.html (accessed 6 October 2011). This webpage describes the history, responsibilities, and areas of emphasis of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Center for Law and Military Operations. U.S. Government Interagency Complex Contingency Operations Organizational and Legal Handbook. Charlottesville, VA: Center for Law and Military Operations, 2004. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/clamo_interagency_complex_legal.pdf (accessed 13 March 2012). This handbook focuses on three types of interagency complex contingency operations: natural disaster assistance, post-conflict restoration, and noncombatant evacuation operations. It seeks to increase the […]

Carreau, Bernard. Transforming the Interagency System for Complex Operations. Case Studies in Defense Transformation no. 6. Fort McNair, DC: National Defense University, 2007. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA463738&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (accessed 29 July 2011). This case study examines one aspect of the transformation and reorientation undergone by the Department of Defense during the War on Terror: efforts by the Executive Branch […]

Carafano, James Jay. 2011. Five Missteps in Interagency Reform – And What to Do About Them. Prism Vol. 2, no. 3 (June): 115-124. http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/images/prism2-3/Prism_115-124_Carafano.pdf (accessed 21 July 2011). This article identifies five major impediments to interagency reform, discusses their implications for interagency operations, and gives recommendations on how they might be addressed.

Carafano, James Jay. 2010. Interagency Operations: General Geoffrey Keyes in Austria 1947-1950. Military Review Vol. 90, no. 1 (January/February): 63-72. http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/MilitaryReview/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20100228_art012.pdf (accessed 2 August 2011). This article describes the experience of General Geoffrey Keyes, the military high commissioner of the post-WWII occupation forces in Austria. Keyes’ struggles against clashing departmental and agency cultures, evolution beyond […]

Benson, Bill. 2012. Unified Land Operations: The Evolution of Army Doctrine for Success in the 21st Century. Military Review Vol. 92, no. 2 (March/April): 2-12. http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/MilitaryReview/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20120430_art004.pdf (accessed 5 April 2012). This article introduces the logic behind the Unified Land Operations concept by presenting a history of Army doctrine beginning in 1982 with the advent of […]

Buss, John C. “The State Department Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization and Its Interaction with the Department of Defense.” Issue Paper, Center for Strategic Leadership, United States Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA, 2005. http://www.csl.army.mil/usacsl/Publications/09-05-S-CRS-DOD.pdf (accessed 6 October 2011). This paper analyzes the functions of the State Department Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and […]

Buchanan, Jeffrey. 2009. Death of the Combatant Command? Toward a Joint Interagency Approach. Joint Forces Quarterly, no. 52 (Winter): 92-96. http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume7/march_2009/3_09_1.html (accessed 20 July 2011). This article explores the interagency process. Is it broken? Why or how? And can it be fixed? Possible solutions with are suggested, and potential consequences are discussed.

Bruneau, Thomas C., Florina Cristiana Matei, and Sak Skoda. 2009. National Security Councils: Their Potential Functions in Democratic Civil-Military Relations. Defense & Security Analysis Vol. 25, no. 3 (September): 255-269. http://ccmr.org/public/library_file_proxy.cfm/lid/5648 (accessed 19 January 2012). This article builds on recent contributions to the study of civil–military relations (CMR) by broadening the focus beyond democratic control […]