Bibliography Category: Interagency Relationships, Networks, and Contracts

Posted: March 20, 2012 by

Barnett, Thomas. “Unity of Effort Requires Unity.” http://thomaspmbarnett.com/globlogization/2007/3/22/unity-of-effort-requires-unity-of-command.html (accessed 18 October 2009). This is a blog entry describing and (harshly) critiquing the various schemes for food distribution and economic development in post-Saddam Hussein Iraq.

... Read More

Posted: March 20, 2012 by

Bardach, Eugene. Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998. This book examines the value of interagency cooperation at the state and local level.

... Read More

Posted: March 20, 2012 by

Bane, Frank. 1942. Cooperative Government in Wartime. Public Administration Review Vol. 2, no. 2: 95-103. Additional information is not available.

... Read More

Posted: March 20, 2012 by

Bache, Ian and Matthew V. Flinders. Multi-Level Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005. This is a collection that includes leading scholars from a range of disciplines to assess and critique the key concept of multi-level governance. Multi-level governance has been widely adopted to explain the changing nature of domestic and international politics within […]

... Read More

Posted: March 19, 2012 by

Arnas, Neyla. 2010. “Connecting Government Capabilities for Overseas Missions.” Complex Operations Newsletter Vol. 2, no. 11-02 (November): 47-62. http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/call/docs/11-02/11-02.pdf (accessed 5 October 2011). This article examines civil-military integration in the field under a wide range of circumstances, including embassies, geographic commands, and more complex operations. It describes the nature of these situations, and offers suggestions […]

... Read More

Posted: March 19, 2012 by

Agranoff, Robert and Valerie A. Lindsay. 1983. Intergovernmental Management: Perspectives from Human Services Problem Solving at the Local Level. Public Administration Review Vol. 43, no. 3: 227-237. Additional information is not available.

... Read More

Posted: March 19, 2012 by

Agranoff, Robert. Managing Within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007. Additional information is not available.

... Read More

Posted: March 19, 2012 by

Agranoff, Robert. Leveraging Networks: A Guide for Public Managers Working across Organizations. Arlington, VA: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government, 2003. http://academic.udayton.edu/richardghere/org%20theory%202009/major%20readings/AgranoffReport.%20networkspdf.pdf (accessed 28 July 2011). This study seeks to determine if public managers operate differently in interorganizational networks than they do in the organizations where they do the majority of their work. This […]

... Read More

Posted: March 19, 2012 by

Agranoff, Robert. “Comparative Intergovernmental Relations,” in Randall Baker’s (ed.). Comparative Public Management. New York, NY: Praeger, 1994. classwebs.spea.indiana.edu/bakerr/v575/Chapter%2012.doc (accessed 13 October 2011). This paper seeks to identify and compare practices of intergovernmental relations (IGR) across all levels. It defines IGR, discusses various instruments that aid in the practice of IGR, and raises various issues and concerns […]

... Read More

Posted: March 19, 2012 by

Agranoff, Robert. 2006. Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers. Public Administration Review Vol. 66, no. s1: 56-65. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x/pdf (accessed 26 October 2011). Included abstract: This paper offers practical insights for public managers as they work within interorganizational networks. It is based on the author’s empirical study of 14 networks involving federal, state, and […]

... Read More
  • "*" indicates required fields

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

    Sign up to receive updates by email. We do not sell or share your info.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.