INTERAGENCY BIBLIOGRAPHY

“I submit that the risk of not sharing [information] today is a lot greater than the risk of sharing.”

– GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, USAF, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, 2005

Interagency Bibliography The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is part of the Center’s mission to foster and develop an interagency body of knowledge and to promote the research, study, and analysis of interagency issues. The bibliography contains over 1,200 entries regarding interagency issues, and includes reports from the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service, professional publications by subject matter experts, and academic research from both military and non-military institutions. The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is organized by topic. Bibliography entries that involve more than one topic are grouped by the most relevant or prevailing topic. Users may follow the links below to navigate the bibliography, or they may use the website’s search engine located at the upper right of the page.

The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography was last updated 09/30/2016.

Posted: April 12, 2012 by the

Chen, Yi-Ru. “Tell Me What I Need to Know: What Mayors and Governors Want from Their Fusion Center.” Master’s Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 2009. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2009/Sep/09Sep_Chen.pdf (accessed 20 July 2011). This thesis aims to gain a better understanding of mayors’ and governor’s experiences with their fusion centers as the primary leaders accountable to their […]

... Read More

Posted: April 12, 2012 by the

Charles, Marian and Jan Horwath. 2009. Investing in Interagency Training to Safeguard Children: An Act of Faith of an Act of Reason?. Children & Society Vol. 23, no. 5 (September): 364-376. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00224.x/pdf (accessed 17 August 2011). The purpose of this study is to chart the history of interagency training in the context of developing, initially, […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Chappell, James Logan. “Heroin Threat from Columbia.” Master’s Thesis, Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 1996. http://cgsc.cdmhost.com/cdm/singleitem/collection/p4013coll2/id/896 (accessed 12 August 2011). This master’s thesis assesses the Colombian opium and heroin production threat to the U.S. since it was first perceived in 1990. It compares and contrasts the production of heroin to that of […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Chan, Hon S. 2003. The Civil Service Under One Country, Two Systems: The Cases of Hong Kong and the Peoples’ Republic of China. Public Administration Review Vol. 63, no. 4: 405-417. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540-6210.00304/pdf (accessed 26 October 2011). Under the principle of “one country, two systems,” Hong Kong’s and China’s civil services are changing, but they are […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Chadwick, Bob. “Civil Affairs Campaign Planning for Complex Contingency Operations: Getting it Right.” Strategy Research Project, United States Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA, 1999. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA364593&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf (accessed 18 October 2011). This paper will focus on integration of the interagency process and Civil Affairs Campaign Planning by the Combatant CINC. It will analyze interagency and military […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Cerami, Joseph R., Robin Dorff, Lisa M. Moorman. Leadership and National Security Reform: The Next President’s Agenda. Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2008. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB888.pdf (8 August 2011). This report describes the discussion and findings of a colloquium held in 2008 by Texas A&M University, the University […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Cerami, Joseph R. and Jeffrey A. Engel. Rethinking Leadership and “Whole of Government” National Security Reform: Problems, Progress, and Prospects. Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2010. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB992.pdf (accessed 15 August 2011). This book collects a variety of essays and papers that seek to examine whether and […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Cerami, Joseph R. and Jay W. Boggs. The Interagency and Counterinsurgency Warfare: Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction Roles. Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College, Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2007. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB828.pdf (accessed 12 August 2011). This monograph addresses the security, stability, transition, and reconstruction missions that place the most pressure on interagency […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Cerami, Joseph R. and Jay W. Boggs. The Interagency and Counterinsurgency Warfare: Aligning and Integrating Military and Civilian Roles in Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction Operations. Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2008. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubid=828 (accessed 28 July 2011). This monograph addresses the security, stability, transition, and reconstruction […]

... Read More

Posted: April 11, 2012 by the

Cerami, Joseph R. 2011. “What is to be Done? Aligning and Integrating the Interagency Process in Support and Stability Operations.” The Army in Interagency Operations Newsletter no. 11-22 (March): 9-16. http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/call/docs/11-22/11-22.pdf (accessed 5 October 2011). This study addresses the topic of aligning and integrating military and civilian roles in stability operations. It focuses on five […]

... Read More

  • "*" indicates required fields

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

    Sign up to receive updates by email. We do not sell or share your info.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.