INTERAGENCY BIBLIOGRAPHY

“I submit that the risk of not sharing [information] today is a lot greater than the risk of sharing.”

– GENERAL RICHARD MYERS, USAF, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, 2005

Interagency Bibliography The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is part of the Center’s mission to foster and develop an interagency body of knowledge and to promote the research, study, and analysis of interagency issues. The bibliography contains over 1,200 entries regarding interagency issues, and includes reports from the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Research Service, professional publications by subject matter experts, and academic research from both military and non-military institutions. The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography is organized by topic. Bibliography entries that involve more than one topic are grouped by the most relevant or prevailing topic. Users may follow the links below to navigate the bibliography, or they may use the website’s search engine located at the upper right of the page.

The Simons Center’s interagency bibliography was last updated 09/30/2016.

Posted: April 25, 2012 by the

Daley, Dorothy. 2009. Interdisciplinary Problems and Agency Boundaries: Exploring Effective Cross-Agency Collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Vol. 19, no. 3, (July): 477-493. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1425965 (accessed 27 July 2011). This article examines factors promoting or inhibiting effective working relationships between environmental agencies and state and local public health departments in Wisconsin on a range […]

... Read More

Posted: April 24, 2012 by the

Dale, Catherine, Nina Serafino, and Pat Towell. Organizing the U.S. Government for National Security: Overview of the Interagency Reform Debates. CRS Report for Congress RL34455. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, April 2008. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/104695.pdf (accessed 20 July 2011). This report, created for Committees and Members of Congress, summarizes and categorizes the various arguments for national security […]

... Read More

Posted: April 24, 2012 by the

Dale, Catherine. Building an Interagency Cadre of National Security Professionals: Proposals, Recent Experience, and Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress RL34565. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, July 2008. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL34565.pdf (accessed 26 July 2011). This report focuses primarily on analyzing key issues that Members of Congress may wish to consider in evaluating existing or proposed […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

Curry, Peter. Dynamic Tension: Security, Stability, and the Opium Trade. in Karen Gutteri’s Complex Operations Case Studies Series Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Center for Complex Operations, National Defense University, 2010. http://www.nps.edu/Academics/AcademicGroups/GPPAG/Docs/PDF/Research%20and%20Publications/2_TN_Dynamic_Tension.pdf (accessed 19 December 2011). This case study discusses and draws lessons from the experiences of a fictional brigade commander (based on a composite of […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

Culkin, David T. IAE 11-03W, Role of Information Management in Advancing Homeland Security. Fort Leavenworth, KS: CGSC Foundation Press, 2011. http://thesimonscenter.org/iae-11-03w-july-2011 (accessed 12 October 2011). This essay addresses the current processes and challenges in regard to information sharing and decision making, and makes suggestions for an updated decision making model that would reflect the role […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

C-SPAN. 2010. Interagency Contracts (Part II): Management and Oversight. Program 12931-1. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/IIMa (accessed 29 July 2011). This is a video clip of a hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The hearing examined the rapid proliferation of interagency contracting vehicles in recent years. It reviewed the potential benefits and shortcomings of interagency […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

C-SPAN. 2010. Interagency Contracts (Part I): Management and Oversight. Program 13070-1. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/PartIO (accessed 29 July 2011). This is a video clip of a hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The hearing examined the rapid proliferation of interagency contracting vehicles in recent years. It reviewed the potential benefits and shortcomings of interagency […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

C-SPAN. 2010. FY 2011 Budget Proposals to Support the Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities. Program 16752-1. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/FY2011b (accessed 29 July 2011). This is a video clip of budget proposals to the Senate Appropriations Committee. The objective of these proposals was the appropriation of funds for interagency cooperation on the creation of sustainable communities across the […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

C-SPAN. 2009. Public Safety and Homeland Security. Program 288363-1. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/SafetyandH (accessed 29 July 2011). This is a video clip of a speech before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by Jamie Barnett, the chief of the FCC Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. He talked about public safety, homeland security and improving emergency responses to disasters […]

... Read More

Posted: April 23, 2012 by the

C-SPAN. 2008. National Joint Terrorism Task Force. Program 201066-3. http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/JointTe (accessed 29 July 2011). This is a video clip of a speech by Greg Massa, Chief of the National Joint Terrorism Task Force (NJTTF) at the FBI. He talked about how the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces began and expanded, what current NJTTF capabilities are, […]

... Read More

1 93 94 95 96 97 123
  • "*" indicates required fields

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

    Sign up to receive updates by email. We do not sell or share your info.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.